New powers to tackle rogue waste operators, which may have prevented the Hunter’s Tip disaster, have come into force.

The Environment Agency now has the authority to lock up illegal waste sites and block access to the operator, in order to prevent tonnes of waste piling up and posing a risk to the environment.

It has also been granted the power to require rogue operators to clear all the waste at a problem site, not just the illegal waste.

The new waste crime powers come too late for the people of Lockwood, who suffered almost nine months of disruption from the blaze at the abandoned tip.

Video Loading

The overflowing waste site at Queens Mill Road went up in flames on August 17, 2016, just a few months after Kirklees Council had sought injunctions over alleged breaches of the amount of waste dumped there.

The huge blaze took several days to extinguish and firefighters were damping down the site on a daily basis until March the following year.

The whole incident is known to have cost taxpayers more than £1m.

Former operator Sam Hunter has so far escaped any legal action over the incident after he disposed of his interests in the site.

Video Loading

The Environment Agency said last year it was still investigating the incident.

The government said its action had come in response to a public consultation where 90% of respondents supported proposals for the regulator to take physical steps to curb illegal waste activity.

As the fight against waste crime ramps up, the Environment Agency has also announced that its waste enforcement officers will be equipped with body worn video cameras on their visits to waste sites.

The move follows a growing number of abusive incidents during site inspections.

Video Loading

Paul Whitehill, Environment Agency waste officer, said: “As a former police officer, I’ve seen routine visits rapidly escalate into threatening, or sometimes even violent, situations. Sadly the same risks apply to the Environment Agency’s officers.

“We want to get on with our jobs without the threat of violence and the cameras will help to protect staff and bring obstructive individuals to justice.”

In 2016/17, the Environment Agency brought 138 prosecutions against businesses or individuals for waste crime offences, yielding more than £2m in fines.

An extra £30m of funding was announced last November to tackle waste crime – an issue that drives business away from legitimate operators, blights communities and endangers the environment.

Video Loading

Environment Minister, Thérèse Coffey, said: “These new powers will give the Environment Agency the tools they need to curb the rise of waste sites that continue to break the law and blight our communities.

“Through our 25 year environment plan we want to be the first generation to leave the environment in a better state than we inherited it.

“As part of that commitment I am determined to crack down on these criminals and these new powers will be crucial in ending this criminal activity once and for all, backed up by £30 million of new money.”

Sir James Bevan, Chief Executive of the Environment Agency, said: “These are tough new sanctions against waste criminals and their unscrupulous activity which not only drains the economy but causes harm to the environment and damages livelihoods across the country. Last year, we closed down more than two illegal waste sites a day, and we’re determined to keep going.

Video Loading

“As we step up our fight against waste criminals, we also have a duty to protect our officers who put themselves in potentially hostile situations when they visit sites for inspections or to serve notices. The introduction of the bodycams provides an added deterrent as our officers do the important job of fighting waste crime.

“The use of body cameras was first trialled by the Environment Agency in the north east. Footage captured on a bodycam was recently used to bring a conviction against an offender for the first time. The defendant was found guilty of wilfully obstructing the officers in the execution of their duty and using abusive behaviour towards two officers.”