A POLITICIAN has rubbished speculation that she could be in line for a massive pay rise.

Two proposed changes could see MPs’ salaries rocket from £60,000 a year to nearly £100,000.

But Wakefield MP Mary Creagh believes the speculation is unfounded.

Ms Creagh, whose constituency includes Denby Dale, told the Examiner: “I think it’s highly unlikely that MPs are going to be given salaries of £100,000 a year. This year we voted for a below-inflation rise of 1.9%.

“The issue now is transparency of the expenses we receive to maintain offices, employ staff and for accommodation in London. As elected politicians we must be as open as possible.

“Last year I was one of just eight MPs who voted for complete transparency and my position has not changed.”

Senior MPs on the Members’ Estimate Committee are considering a plan to replace second home expenses with a pay rise. The Additional Cost Allowance for MPs’ London houses is worth a maximum of £22,000 a year.

The second increase, of up to £15,000, is being considered by the House of Commons Commission to compensate MPs for several years of below-inflation pay rises.

But Barry Sheerman believes MPs shouldn’t decide their own salaries.

The Huddersfield MP said: “There should be an independent body which settles pay levels; MPs shouldn’t vote on this sort of thing. We’re in a mess that pleases no-one.

“I can’t wait for an independent commission to set salaries. I’ve become weary of the constant sniping. I’m tired of the whole situation.”

In January MPs voted for the 1.9% rise after pressure from the Prime Minister to show restraint.